百萬英鎊英文讀後感
I knew Mark Twain when i was a middle school student. In my memory, there is an article in my English textbook that written by him. At that time, I pay no attention to Mark Twain. However, i knew more about him after I learned the History and Anthology of American Literature, he appeals to me dearly and deeply. As a result, I read a part of his novels in part time. Here I will introduce Million Pounds to you. Before that, I will give some information about Mark Twain to you. And last, it comes my though.
Samuel Langhorne Clemens （November 30, 1835 – April 21, 1910） was an American humorist, satirist, lecturer and writer, better known by the pen name Mark Twain. He was born in Florida, Missouri and brought up in Hannibal, Missouri. After his father's death in 1847, he was apprenticed to a printer and wrote for his brother's newspaper. He later worked as a licensed Mississippi river-boat pilot. The Civil War put an end to the steamboat traffic and Clemens moved to Virginia City, where he edited the Territorial Enterprise. On February 3, 1863, 'Mark Twain' was born when Clemens signed a humorous travel account with that pseudonym. He often uses exaggerated ways to show his irony.
Mark Twain is most noted for his novels Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, and The Adventures of Tom Sawyer. He is also known for his quotations. During his life, Clemens became a friend to presidents, artists, leading industrialists and European royalty. For I love the One Million Pounds Note best, I would introduce it to you.
Is there real free-lunch in the world? Maybe there is! And such kind of “free lunch” strikes the poor and honest young man Henry Adams who has surprisingly got a one-million bank note from the brothers （Roderick & Oliver）。 As a matter of fact, the brothers had made a bet, if a poor, honest and clever people who come knocking on the door received the one million pounds, what will be happening to his life? The elder brother think that he would starve to death because he could not prove that the money belongs to him, will be arousing others’ suspicion, ()and even the banks do not let him deposit the money. On the contrary, the younger brother believes that he would live in a very good life. So the brothers lend the one million pounds to Henry Adams, and spent 30 days abroad. From then on, Henry Adams becomes a bright focus of the money-priority society. Later, the lucky young man experiences two sharply different treatments in the tailor shop. In the ball, people from every social class try every chance to show their friendship and flattery to the new millionaire. Adams never has the chance to spend a penny because no one can change the million and he is soon living in a luxurious hotel suite, wearing expensive suits. No one asks him to pay bill, these are forwarded for later payment. He even gets the chance to go to the Party that held by Duke. Fortunately, Henry meets Jane Griffiths and fall in love with this beautiful woman. He also comes across his good friend. The man gives him some advice to earn money. 30 days has passed, Henry Adams asks his girlfriend company him to meet the brothers. Out of his expectation, his girlfriend is the daughter of one of the brothers. And finally he got a very good job from the brother. And he lived a very happy life.
Mark Twain's short story of "one million pounds note" is a very good work. The article satires the thoughts of "money is everything," "money is omnipotent," and expose the ugly face of capitalist society. As we all know, the root of the story was the bet of the brothers. What is the bet actually? Where does the attraction of the bank note lie in?
As far as i am concerned, the One Million Pounds Note takes an interesting, satirical look at the hypocrisy stemming from class distinction in England. England is a country where class and wealth are given extreme significance, especially among the rich. The novel shows the hypocrisy that existed among these people, how the rich are quick to change face when they find out that you're a man of wealth and how within the next moment they revert back to their condescending selves when all wealth is lost. The story was based on the main theme by emphasizing on the hypocrisy of the upper class society but at the same time it also creates a balance that prevents the novel from being a mockery of the British society. The love story appears at the right time and there is plenty of comedy to keep one entertained. The ending is a little predictable but the director does an overall good job by rounding it up and presenting his points.
In my heart, Herry was so luckily, not everyone can get the chance to use the million. I am so envious of the "lucky" of the heroine, but at the same time I would like to think that the reason why people carry favor with him is just that they attract too much important to money, isn’t it? Money worship is shameful and should not be reaping more! Money is not omnipotent, and in the world, there are many things that more important than money ……
百萬英鎊讀後感英文
Mark Twain's short story of "one million pounds" is a very good work. The article on the "money is everything," "money is omnipotent," the idea of a satire, to expose the ugly face of capitalist society.
"One million pounds" is about a poor, honest man, that is, the heroine of this story has received a pair of brothers, the letter sent to him inside one million pounds. The brothers had made a bet, gambling, if a poor, honest people who come knocking on the door received the one million pounds, he will be what kind of results? Brother that he would starve to death because he could not prove that the money was his own, will be subject to other people's doubts, and even the banks do not let him save money. His younger brother that he would lead a very good, and therefore they have the brothers of one million pounds will be loaned to check the poorest people, and spent 30 days abroad. Did not expect that during this period of time, people have the rare fortune suddenly rich, has tried to cozy up to him, from the free food, buy clothes, free accommodation, like a beggar, like to please him, and continue to improve his social status until the exception of the highest outdoor Wang Duke on! Not only that, ()he also has been a good wife and 30,000 pounds of bank interest, and finally from two brothers got a very good job. Lived a very, very happy life.
See here, I am so envious of the "lucky" the heroine, but at the same time I would like to: people reason to curry favor with him, not just because when people value money too it? Worship of money is shameful and should not be reaping more! Money is not omnipotent, the world than money, there are many more important things … …
蠅王讀後感（一）
故事發生在想像中的第三次世界大戰，一場未來的核戰爭中，一架飛機帶著一群男孩從英國本土飛向南方疏散。飛機被擊落，孩子們乘坐的機艙落到一座世外桃源般的，荒無人煙的島上。起初這群孩子齊心協力，後來由於害怕所謂“野獸”，分裂成兩排，以崇尚本能的專制派壓倒了講究理性的民主派告終。
我覺得這是一個十分引起人們思考的一本小說。印發了人們對“人性的黑暗”的認識。首先拉爾夫應該是主角吧，從一開始被選做頭領開始他就很盡責任的開始像一個大人一樣指揮。
最後的最後，大家的童心都已不復存在。多多少少他們都殺過人，他們的雙手早已不乾淨。文中貫穿全文的野獸，其實西蒙早已知道“大概野獸就是咱們自己”所有所謂想出來的野獸還是空中來的野獸都只是突出真正的野獸其實是人本身，
蠅王讀後感（二）
《蠅王》（LordoftheFiles）的作者威廉戈爾丁（WilliamGolding）生於1911年英國，是1983年諾貝爾文學獎的獲得者。小說情節並不複雜，描述的是在未來的一場核戰爭中，一架載著一群被疏散的男孩的飛機被擊落，倖存的孩子落到一座美麗的珊瑚島上，最終這些來自文明社會的孩子一步步蛻變成了野蠻人。
作者經歷過二戰，殘酷的戰爭使作者深刻認識到“惡出於人猶如蜜產於蜂”，他也正是通過這部作品來闡述這一事實。全書通過對孩子們臆想出的海裡的野獸、空中的野獸的描述，反映出真正的野獸其實就來自人本身，就是人的獸性發作。書中的孩子們一開始代表的是純淨、天真，
時間進入二十一世紀，這些先賢聖哲的作品離我們漸行漸遠，可是人性的本質卻並沒有發生太大變化。我們放棄原則和操守，向臆想的“野獸”低頭，文明社會的規範有時顯得那樣蒼白無力。在故事的結尾孩子們得救了，要回歸文明社會了，主人公哭了。回歸了文明社會就得到救贖了嗎？我看未必，真正的救贖在哪兒？我說不清。
蠅王讀後感（三）
《蠅王》是一本以孩子為主角的書，但卻不是一本通常意義上的兒童文學，這是一本寫給大人看的書，荒島上的兒童世界只是現實生活中成人世界的一個縮影。
在沒有大人的情況下，孩子們開始了在島上的冒險生活，這看似平靜的開局沒有延續。故事的一路發展出乎了所有讀者的預料，讀者被故事的情節所震驚也被故事所揭示的人性面貌而震驚。
島上的孩子中最突出的要算是十二歲的英國海軍司令的兒子——拉夫爾，有著一頭耀眼金髮的他舉止優雅、自信樂觀。()初至荒島，半長大的他為脫離了大人的管制獲得自由而欣喜若狂，
然而隨著唱詩班在傑克的帶領下一次次和野獸進行血腥地廝殺並獲得勝利之後，原本不屬於這個年紀孩子的獸性本能開始膨脹。人類千年積累下來的社會文明不禁推敲，在數次打獵之後就開始喪失，小島上的和平也在漸漸被打亂。人類千年的文明可以在瞬間崩潰，因為在它裡面，是千年不變的人性。
“海螺”和“蠅王”是文章當中兩個相對的意象。海螺能將所有的人彙集到一起。海螺被作為一種文明的象徵，出於對吹響海螺人的崇拜，拉爾夫被選為頭頭，並制定了一個規則，只有持海螺的人才能發言。也許規則在短時間內能夠得以執行的原因，不過是因為剛從文明世界出來的孩子，懲罰的恐懼還在迫使他們遵守。然而在一個陌生的環境下“蠅王”的神秘出現打破了平靜。“蠅王”即蒼蠅之王，源于希伯萊語Baalzebub，在《聖經》中“Baal”被當作“萬惡之首”，在英語中，“蠅王”是污穢物之王，也是醜惡靈魂的同義詞。蠅王似乎只是一個模糊的象徵，那麼蠅王究竟是何物？
懷著這個好奇繼續閱讀，我們發現有一個人也像我們一般在探究這個問題。他是“西蒙”。當感到恐懼的孩子們為“野獸”的事情爭論不休的時候，西蒙這個“瘦小卻挺有精神”的小孩發現了所謂“野獸大概就是我們自己”的真理，卻遭到了眾人的唾駡。為了弄清“野獸”的真相，他決定到山頂看個究竟，在中途休息時偶見被當做貢品的爬滿蒼蠅的野豬頭。神情恍惚中，西蒙仿佛看見一個碩大的蒼蠅之王對他說明了“野獸”作為人性的一部分，並預言了他會被眾人殺死的下場。到了山頂，西蒙發現大家所畏懼的“野獸”其實是一個飛行員的屍體，於是不顧虛弱的身體下山去告訴大家，卻被眾人誤認為是“野獸”而殺害。
孩子們殺死了唯一一個瞭解真相的人，西蒙之死也是真理之死。對西蒙的謀殺，是孩子們內心“惡”膨脹的必然結果，標誌著他們道德良知的毀滅。在他們看來，蛇、水中怪獸、空中來的怪獸，甚至他們追逐的野豬，都是“野獸”，他們甚至把已經變得邪惡了的目光投射到西蒙身上，把他也看作是野獸，所以他們毫不顧忌地將西蒙殺死而不感到任何良心的不安。人性的墮落和獨立人格的喪失使這群孩子經受了最為深重的打擊，野獸“的預言得到了證明。接下去的發展就更像是一部恐怖電影。暴力猶如細菌傳染一般在孩子們間蔓延。
隨著打獵的進行，傑克帶領獵人們跳舞並重複單調的歌詞、無法停止的狂歡、西蒙被殺後孩子們集體的舞蹈，都像是宗教早期的萌生。人在無法改變的環境中，產生本能的恐懼，從而祈求通過對動物以及未知事物的崇拜來祈求自身的平安。
哲學家告訴我們，人性在本來不可分的意義上統合以下三重屬性。即：人性第一層：生物性，偏於惡；人性第二層：社會性，善惡兼而有之；人性第三層：精神性，偏於善。這篇小說也被很多讀者認為是在崇尚”性本惡“的理論，開始在我看來不過是告訴人們適者生存的規則罷了。打獵、吃肉不過是人們生存下去的一種本能追求。
在一個更黑暗的時期到來之前，拉爾夫終於還是盼來了救援的船隻。”文明“終於的再次到來無疑是對小島上”野蠻“文化的一次衝擊，”希望“再次降臨。文明的進化亦或是退化，也許只是根據環境相對而言罷了。
拉爾夫被選為頭頭，並制定了一個規則，只有持海螺的人才能發言。也許規則在短時間內能夠得以執行的原因，不過是因為剛從文明世界出來的孩子，懲罰的恐懼還在迫使他們遵守。然而在一個陌生的環境下“蠅王”的神秘出現打破了平靜。“蠅王”即蒼蠅之王，源于希伯萊語Baalzebub，在《聖經》中“Baal”被當作“萬惡之首”，在英語中，“蠅王”是污穢物之王，也是醜惡靈魂的同義詞。蠅王似乎只是一個模糊的象徵，那麼蠅王究竟是何物？懷著這個好奇繼續閱讀，我們發現有一個人也像我們一般在探究這個問題。他是“西蒙”。當感到恐懼的孩子們為“野獸”的事情爭論不休的時候，西蒙這個“瘦小卻挺有精神”的小孩發現了所謂“野獸大概就是我們自己”的真理，卻遭到了眾人的唾駡。為了弄清“野獸”的真相，他決定到山頂看個究竟，在中途休息時偶見被當做貢品的爬滿蒼蠅的野豬頭。神情恍惚中，西蒙仿佛看見一個碩大的蒼蠅之王對他說明了“野獸”作為人性的一部分，並預言了他會被眾人殺死的下場。到了山頂，西蒙發現大家所畏懼的“野獸”其實是一個飛行員的屍體，於是不顧虛弱的身體下山去告訴大家，卻被眾人誤認為是“野獸”而殺害。
孩子們殺死了唯一一個瞭解真相的人，西蒙之死也是真理之死。對西蒙的謀殺，是孩子們內心“惡”膨脹的必然結果，標誌著他們道德良知的毀滅。在他們看來，蛇、水中怪獸、空中來的怪獸，甚至他們追逐的野豬，都是“野獸”，他們甚至把已經變得邪惡了的目光投射到西蒙身上，把他也看作是野獸，所以他們毫不顧忌地將西蒙殺死而不感到任何良心的不安。人性的墮落和獨立人格的喪失使這群孩子經受了最為深重的打擊，野獸“的預言得到了證明。接下去的發展就更像是一部恐怖電影。暴力猶如細菌傳染一般在孩子們間蔓延。
隨著打獵的進行，傑克帶領獵人們跳舞並重複單調的歌詞、無法停止的狂歡、西蒙被殺後孩子們集體的舞蹈，都像是宗教早期的萌生。人在無法改變的環境中，產生本能的恐懼，從而祈求通過對動物以及未知事物的崇拜來祈求自身的平安。
哲學家告訴我們，人性在本來不可分的意義上統合以下三重屬性。即：人性第一層：生物性，偏於惡；人性第二層：社會性，善惡兼而有之；人性第三層：精神性，偏於善。這篇小說也被很多讀者認為是在崇尚”性本惡“的理論，開始在我看來不過是告訴人們適者生存的規則罷了。打獵、吃肉不過是人們生存下去的一種本能追求。
在一個更黑暗的時期到來之前，拉爾夫終於還是盼來了救援的船隻。”文明“終於的再次到來無疑是對小島上”野蠻“文化的一次衝擊，”希望“再次降臨。文明的進化亦或是退化，也許只是根據環境相對而言罷了。
