釣魚讀後感（一）
在我讀過的書籍中，最令我難忘的一篇文章是《釣魚》。
這個故事講的是“我”和父親在鱸魚開放日的前一天晚上來釣魚。因為離鱸魚開放還有很長時間，可就在這時，我們竟然釣到了一條大鱸魚，魚鱗在月光下閃閃發亮，爸爸卻讓我把魚放進水中，“我”十分不解，十分氣憤，可又覺得爸爸的話是對的，因為：還沒到釣鱸魚開放的時間，就算沒人看到，也要遵守約定。三十四年後那個男孩，已成了紐約一位著名的建築師了。
這篇文章雖短，卻告訴我們一個深刻的道理：面對誘惑時，要有能力去抵制，
我把錢交給了班主任，並且很為自己的行為感到驕傲，撫摸著胸前的紅領巾我開心地笑了。後來雖然被媽媽責駡了，但我一點也不傷心，因為我的內心是坦然的。
的確，心底無私天地寬。做人就要坦坦蕩蕩。能夠抵擋住誘惑才行。
釣魚讀後感（二）
在《莫泊桑短篇小說精選》中，有著許多感人的故事，釣魚就是其中的一篇。
《釣魚》講的是：兩個要好的釣魚愛好者在一場戰爭中，忍不住想釣魚的心情，悄悄地出了城，來到了城外一個常來的池塘邊釣魚。為了不被敵人發現，他們躲進了身旁的蘆葦叢中，希望能躲過一劫，可敵人最後還是發現了他們。敵人把他們誤認為是間諜，是來監視他們的，
這個故事告訴了我：不要為了自己的利益，生命，不惜犧牲別人的生命和鮮血，要想到集體，想到他人。為了大局找想，甚至捨己為人，寧死不屈。
一個寧死不屈的人的死，一個視人民的利益高於一切的人的死，一個對國家對社會做出貢獻的人的死，又有什麼遺憾可言呢？正如“人必有一死，有的重於泰山，有的輕於鴻毛”這句話所說，有的人嘴上說得好，可實際做不到這樣壯烈！
我想，這是我們一生要努力做到的。所以，讓我們從現在開始做起，從現在開始為目標而奮鬥吧！
釣魚讀後感（三）
學習了《釣魚的啟示》這篇課文，我深有感觸。
課文主要是講述一件發生在離捕撈鱸魚開放日前兩個小時的故事。
每當我走在大街上，滿地垃圾總會引起我()的反感：怎麼會有人亂丟垃圾如此惡劣呢？沒有社會公德心，素質差！然後是掩鼻加快腳步逃開。學了這篇文章後，再回過頭想想，我又做的如何呢？除了不快、發牢騷、佯裝視而不見，
雖說道德的抉擇有時很難，而道德缺失則會喪失一切，如果每個人都能關注身邊事關心身邊人，從我做起，時刻反省自己，在各種誘惑下就一定能夠明辨是非、保持清醒。像作者一樣，才能成為最終的勝利者！
這篇文章讓我明白了很多。
哈姆雷特英文讀後感（一）
Prince Hamlet - the tragedy character of Shakespeare
“To be, or not to be, that is the question”。 But after answering this question, what comes next? To be in what kind of ways may bring you the value of life? And is the value precious enough for you to continue living? These are questions that can never be solved. Hamlet chose to live, in order to revenge the tragic death of his honest father, the Danish king. On account of Hamlet was so kind, he missed the best chance of killing his uncle, the murderer of his father. The uncle, who was the new king, devised several plans to kill Hamlet, indirectly killed Hamlet’s beloved Ophelia、Ophelia’s brother and father, and Hamlet’s mother, the new queen who was married to his uncle. These tragedies finally forced Hamlet to make his decision, and stabbed the sword of revenge to his uncle. Unfortunately, Hamlet was already hurt by a sword with poison on it and would be dead quickly at the moment. It was the kindness and hesitation made him fail. For his father, died while having a grasping dream and went to hell for that. Hamlet didn’t kill his uncle while he was praying because if he killed him at that time, he would have gone to heaven. Hamlet didn’t want to return good for evil, this irresolute nature caused the failure of his revenge. But why would god send a person to heaven or hell only considering what he’s thinking about at the last moment of life? Is that really fair? There is no doubt that Hamlet lived in a period of time that everybody was “crazy” and everybody except Hamlet was unaware of the truth. Hamlet even had to fake madness to prevent others from having suspicion. So why being sober when everybody else is drunk? Why being normal when everybody else is mad? It’s to keep your soul clear from being stained, it’s to stop cheating yourself when the truth is already out. It’s worthwhile to die for bringing out the truth, cause living with the concealed truth is worse than dying, especially when the truth that everyone should see is buried with your own hands. “To die - to sleep! But in that sleep of death what dreams may come”， who knows? The heaven loss of life in the play brought us shock, and in a short while, kept us from making the same mistake. But even this does not last too long. Time flies, but even flying time can not stop us from making the tragedy happens again and again. Instead, time took the sadness and regret away, weakened the memory. No more left but the sad touching story and the melody from fair Ophelia when she drowned in running stream. It’s not just a play, it’s something that is happening on the earth every moment. People never learn, soon the laughter and cheers may replace the lamentation, like the newborn roses covered the dead branches in spring. It’s the law of nature, living people continue living, death brings several days of weeping, but what remains? Nothing but dust and soil. This happened before, it’s happening now, but in the future （we hope） this shall never happen again.
哈姆雷特英文讀後感（二）
"Hamlet " of Shakespear is a classical representative work. This book certainly does not have the big difference in the superficial plot with the historical fable,spoke or the Danish prince the story which revenged for the father,in which fills the rank smell of blood violence and dies.Just like the dramatis personae Horatio said:" you may hear to to rape massacre,the unusual repair behavior,the dark center decision,accidental slaughter,borrows the hand murder , as well as falls into suicide result."
Windingly elects the plot,tightly centers on the revenge to launch. Hamlet Wittenberg hurries back the home in a hurry from Germany,is attends his father's funeral,enables him to accept,he not catches up with father's funeral,actually witnessed the mother and the Uncle Claudius' wedding ceremony， this had caused Hamm the Wright suspicion at the heart,added night above meets in the royal palace castle with father's ghost, the ghost sorrow sued, this pile atrocity was Uncle Hamlet the behavior,and wanted him to revenge for the father.To Canada goose parka, he started the difficult revenge course,launched the life and death contest with Claudius.Finally,sent out sword the revenge to Claudius
Hamlet is a man with contradictory,he had many chances to kill Claudius,but he hesitated,which reflects the religious thought poisons.()
