哈姆雷特的讀後感（一）
《哈姆雷特》這本書，敘述的是一個“王子復仇記”，是莎翁的著名悲劇之一，愛與恨的糾纏時刻讓人揪緊了心，從哈姆雷特在痛苦中的經典獨白中我看出哈姆雷特對人生的思考，從他的行動中我看出哈姆雷特對人生的追求。總之，這本書讓我受益頗多。
初讀《哈姆雷特》，我印象中最深的除了哈姆雷特外就數普隆涅斯——莪菲利霞的父親，他的性格很自以為是，還很愛拍馬屁，正如哈姆雷特所說：一個討厭的老傻瓜，但他在兒子勒替斯走時的一段叮囑卻給了我很深的印象，他說：“不要想到什麼就說什麼，
接著，在介紹一下美麗的莪菲利霞，她美麗而且聖潔，卻淪為惡人的工具，但我想她是一個沒有自信的人，她愛哈姆雷特，可有被哈姆雷特的地位所困擾，她認為地位變了，愛情就靠不住，她被封建思想所束縛，她和充滿自由思想的哈姆雷特並不相配。倘若他們在一起的話，必然會有很多的衝突。而且，莪菲利霞也不是一個特別有自製力的人，她真瘋時的表現，讓我對她先前的一切美好表示懷疑，
現在我想大致介紹我眼中的哈姆雷特，“一千個人眼中有一千個哈姆雷特”，我眼中的哈姆雷特是一個特別機智而且正直的人。他的思想不拘泥於他所處時代的主流，他熱愛思考，對生活充滿了希望，當他得知他的父親死于克勞迪斯的謀殺，他雖無力回天，但他為了證實這件事，他導演了一齣戲劇證實了這一點。他善待那些表演的伶人，並不因他們身份地位就瞧不起他們。哈姆雷特對好朋友霍拉旭特別真誠，哈姆雷特曾對他這樣說過：“霍拉旭，你是我交往的人中最正直的一位……因為你雖然經歷一切顛沛，卻不曾受到一點傷害，命運的虐待和恩寵，對於你都是一樣，
還有一個細節，我覺得特別不可思議，就是哈姆雷特沒有殺害在做禱告的克勞迪斯，他認為這樣會然他上天堂。但我想，這樣一個十惡不赦的人，死後必定會下地獄吧，他詭詐又陰險而且兩面三刀“敗壞倫常，嗜殺成性”，真是死不足惜！
看完《哈姆雷特》最大遺憾就在於自己不精通英語，
哈姆雷特的讀後感（二）
《哈姆雷特》是莎士比亞最著名的—部悲劇，它突出地反映了作者的人文主義思想。莎士比亞說過，他的作品就是“給自然照一面鏡子，給德行看一看自己的面目，給荒唐看一看自己的姿態，給時代和社會看一看自己的形象和印記”。《哈姆雷特》正是一個時代的縮影。
哈姆雷特是文藝復興時期人文主義者的理想人物。他是王子，按照傳統，是王權的當然繼承者。但是，他的美好前途被顛倒了的時代顛倒了。戲一開頭，作者就展現了一幅醜惡的社會畫面：國家發生宮廷政變，國王被害，陰謀家竊取了王位；王后改嫁；滿朝臣子趨炎附勢等等。
在《哈姆雷特》這部戲劇中，處處可以看出作者著意把自己心目中的典型人物塑造成一個英雄形象的匠心：哈姆雷特很有心計，在敵強我弱的惡劣情況下，他敢於針鋒相對地進行鬥爭，他擊破了奸王設下的—個個圈套：先是戳穿了波洛涅斯和羅森克蘭等人進行刺探和監視的把戲；又使王后發現天良；接著採用“調包計”除掉了奸王的兩個走卒，把奸王“借刀殺人”的陰謀擊得粉碎；最後“以其人之道還治其人之身”，把雙重陷阱——毒劍和毒酒還給了奸王。在每一回合的鬥爭中，哈姆雷特都顯得形象高大。所以有評論說，《哈姆雷特》是一出“巨人型”的悲劇，此話不無道理。
但哈姆雷特決非“完人”。他雖然善於思索，卻優柔寡斷；他雖然受到人民的愛戴，卻並不相信人民。他說：“時代變得越發不像樣子，—個農民的腳趾竟然這麼靠近一個朝臣的腳後跟，擦傷了後者的凍瘡。”可見哈姆雷特的社會改革與農民所要求的變革相距甚遠。儘管哈姆雷特有令人欽佩的才能，竭力想除舊佈新，但他總是鬱鬱不樂，遲疑不決，他始終是孤立的。這就註定了他與醜惡同歸於盡的悲慘命運。
《哈姆雷特》描寫人物心理的語言十分豐富，這在莎士比亞所有悲劇中也是十分突出的。如哈姆雷特的性格大部分是以“瘋話”表達出來的，他的“滿口荒唐言”就像迸發出來的火花。克勞迪斯陰陽怪氣的語言則照映出了他口蜜腹劍的醜態。波洛涅斯愛用詩體語言，給人以滑稽可笑的印象。
因為它談到了人生的抉擇，談到了一個生活在特定的歷史與生活環境下的人在對他個人來言是獨特的，而對於全人類來說又是普遍的的命運面前，在只有從過去所積累的有限的經驗可以憑藉與依託的情況下，所選擇的人生之路。從某種意義上說，他的經驗也代表了我們自己的經驗，他所面對的命運在我們人生的某個階段裡也是我們所要面對的。我們面對絕望的存在，在矛盾中摸索真理，在迷霧中找尋真相，在兩難問題裡作出行動，在一個失去標準與可以衡量標準的尺度的世界裡重建價值的體系與精神大廈……
哈姆雷特是不完美的，有時他的抉擇是非理性的，相當衝動的，比如當他在激怒之下一劍刺死他誤以為是國王的波洛涅斯時，然而或許正是他這種不理智的抉擇，這種人性的弱點的表現，讓我們打心底裡接受和認同他的藝術形象，因為我們常常可以在自己身上看見他的影子……
總之，《哈姆雷特》是一出人文主義思想家的悲劇，是歐洲文藝復興土壤裡長出來的一朵長開不敗的藝術之花，直至今天，還在散發出它所特有的馨香。
哈姆雷特的讀後感（三）
魯迅先生說：“悲劇是將人生有價值的東西毀滅給人看。”《哈姆雷特》就是一幕極具震撼力的悲劇。哈姆雷特是勇敢的，也是不怕死的；但是，他由於敏感而猶豫不定，由於思索而拖延，精力全花費在做決定上，反而失卻了行動的力量。哈姆雷特理想崇高、思想深刻，他立志重整乾坤，但他又耽於沉思、自責、自我懷疑上，加之憂鬱與孤獨，他迷惘、矛盾又痛苦。於是一再拖延復仇計畫，導致了最後的結局。文中最令人同情的就是悲慘的配角奧菲利婭，她柔弱、沉靜、靦腆又天真無邪。可她那脆弱的身心被愛和恨一起擠壓著、煎熬著。她不幸、痛苦、無助，卻都逆來順受地忍受了它，最終還是迷失了自己，離開了自己。“生存還是毀滅？是默默忍受命運的暴虐，或是挺身反抗人世無涯的苦難，通過鬥爭把它們掃清，這兩種行為，哪一種更高貴？”這峨我不知道，似乎也不是那麼容易分得清的事情，只是哈姆雷特選擇了後者，承擔起了那項他承擔不起，幾乎連渺茫的希望都沒有、但又決不可推卸的復仇重任。如今的現實中，倘若我們遇到了困難，我們是去面對它，還是選擇逃避？我想應該是面對。無論是什麼困難，沒有人解決不了的，除了死亡。可是就算在死亡面前，如果能勇敢的接受，那麼也算的上高貴了。總而言之，不論在什麼艱難險阻面前，我們都應該勇敢面對，接受挑戰。
《哈姆雷特》是一出人文主義思想家的悲劇。在《哈姆雷特》中，莎士比亞曾借人物之口表達自己的戲劇主張："自有戲劇以來，它的目的始終是反映自然，顯示善惡的本來面目，給它的時代看一看演變發展的模型。"悲劇《哈姆雷特》正是劇作家這種現實主義戲劇觀的生動體現。
哈姆雷特是悲劇的中心人物。他是一個典型的人文主義者。人文主義思想是文藝復興時期文學的核心，它體現了新興資產階級的世界觀，是資產階級與封建貴族、教會進行鬥爭的武器。人文主義著反對以神為中心的封建神學，宣傳人是宇宙的主宰，是萬物之本。哈姆雷特對世界和人類抱有巨大的熱情和美好的希望。他說："人是多麼了不起的一件物品！理性是多麼高貴！力量是多麼無窮！行動多麼像天使！瞭解多麼像天神！宇宙的精華！萬物的靈長！"他肯定人的現實生活，渴望純潔的友情和真摯的愛情。他聰明熱情、敏感善思、能文能武。他的戀人峨菲利亞說："啊，一顆多麼高貴的心就是這樣隕落了！"這樣的王子自然得到民眾的擁護，連他的敵人克勞迪斯也承認："他是為糊塗的群眾所喜愛的"。可是他一接觸社會的現實，他所崇拜的父王突然死去，而自己所愛的母親連為丈夫送葬的鞋子都沒有穿舊，就匆忙嫁給了從前受人恥笑的克勞迪斯。他感到憂鬱："人世間的一切在我看來是多麼可厭、陳腐、乏味而無聊！"經過一番深沉的思考，把個人問題與整個社會聯繫起來，發現"時代一切都脫節了"，"丹麥是一座監獄"，"我決心擔負起重整乾坤的責任"。這樣為父報仇實際上成了改造社會的一個具體行動。他有意安排了"戲中戲"以便進一步證實奸王的罪行。當罪行的真-相確證以後，便立即行動。但為了尋找正義的手段，他放棄了在奸王祈禱把他殺死的機會，接著又誤殺了波洛涅斯，這樣就招來被放逐的命令。最後，他雖然逃了回來，在決鬥中殺死了奸王，自己也因中了毒劍而犧牲，"重整乾坤"的責任也落空了。()
《哈姆雷特》在藝術上也能集中體現作者的創作特色。劇作的生活畫面廣闊，情節的展開生動、豐富。劇作所反映的生活畫面，從皇宮到家庭，從深閨到墓地，從軍士守衛到民眾造反，從劇場到比劍場，構成了劇中人物活動的廣闊的背景。莎士比亞非常注重情節的安排，一波未平，一波又起。除復仇的情節之外，還配合諸如愛情、友情、親子關係等，對情節的發展起了推動的作用。與情節的生動性和豐富性相聯繫，作者還組織了豐富多彩的戲劇場面。如"戲中戲"演出的那一場，是一場重點戲，又是過渡戲，是哈姆雷特的思想和行動的轉捩點。
莎士比亞是語言大師。他的戲劇語言豐富多彩，富有詩意。他的劇作主要是用自由的無韻詩體寫成，還有民間歌謠，其人物的語言也變化多端。
刻畫哈姆雷特時，多次運用獨白，詩體與散文交相使用，哲理與抒情相結合，具有強烈的藝術感染力。
《哈姆雷特》是一部巨作，它給我很多很多，值得一看！
紅與黑讀後感英文（一）
Review of The Red And The Black
During extracurricular time, I finished reading The Red And The Black. It was a typical and fundamental European work of criticism and realism which was released in the 19th century. Throughout the whole book, it is fulfilled with the hero Julien’s experiences and final failure during his struggling life. Especially his two love stories, which incisively and vividly revealed the hideous social ethos at the beginning of 19th century. Besides, the book strongly deprecates the impuissance of monarch, noble and the contemptibility of church and bourgeois. Its way of statement is really worth appreciating too.
The author is really good at revealing the serious social problem from love. Julien’s two love experiences were tightly related to the social wind and cloud that time and it was one aspect of class struggle. Julien indeed fell in love with Mrs. de Renal later, but he was only out of a kind of revengeful thought against dignitary at the very beginning. Thereby, when first seizing on Mrs. de Renal’s hand, he felt that it was not the happiness out of love, but Napoleon’s victory of ambition and spree. It is more like the satisfaction of retaliation.
If there was much of love between Julien and Mrs. de Renal in pursuit of her, there must have been no love between Julien and Mathilde but a political game. Mathilde was a haughty and willful noble young girl. She was profoundly influenced by French revolution. She puerilely thought that if there would have been a new revolution, the dominator of this society must be the energetic young people like Julien and marrying him was not only romantic but also dependable. By contrast, Julien believed that if he would have married Mathilde, he could promote his position and rapid advancement in his career and managed to cheat her love.
To Julien, his two loves were failed without any surprise. Julien never could enter the gerentocratic, his love will never be allowed by superior.
The Red And The Black successfully set up a typical role in its special environment. Its shapely art structure and the using of line drawing are really outstanding. Its excellent mind description is very admirable. Realism writers all pay much attention to the truth of detail, but the author of this book not liked to depict the object environment, instead of the roles’ inside ideas. He just used several sentences to introduce the environment and the movement of roles, but use large paragraph to detail the role’s interior mental movement. Julien’s happiness, distress and confess and his complicated mental movement were incisively and vividly described. Besides, the scenery was also a great part of this book. Absolute clear is the beauty of the style. Brief, simplicity and clarity were the most apparent specialty. Different sceneries switching and developing system are much like a film script. It is the typical literary novel.
紅與黑讀後感英文（二）
In even the fate of bellaire. Cable gladne affects me. Throughout his extremely short but is full of twists of young life flowing turmoil with too many contradictions and complex. To this people can make a lot of judgment -- a small SiYouZhe blind pursue personal interests tragedy. An ambitious destruction; A feudal fighter sacrifice etc. All have views but are sensible. I think said even a individualism in would be nice but ambitious than a the pursuit of happiness and unfortunate went wrong people more precisely. Natural this wrong not simply take a memorized the means of social morality but from his mind deeper contradictions essence.
Even in all his life in the pursuit of happiness. Though he but humble origins to education and by good with outstanding wisdom so his future in the so-called these parisians of society. What is happiness and how to achieve happiness is puzzling humanity for thousands of years also puzzling our in even. In their mind happiness and no exact standard just in his deceit in his vigilance his another "battle plan" in its implementation. He is the first out of the abuse and happiness custom for Mrs. Leonard lauder’s front perform "some responsibility" and happiness as proud mathilde in front of your happiness for yield fictions and happy again the hell. He desire happiness eager to rocketing he vowed that he would rather die a thousand times will make a meteoric rise. Therefore he made a and a "war plan" use all sorts of false means he superman wisdom play incisively and vividly. But after all he is a good young plant so in often of happiness he will ask yourself deeply remorse. Therefore his plan always loopholes always questionable.
It is found that even in this kind of happiness in the standard in society and others standard for the standard the pursuit of others and the society admits. In essence he didn’t get much joy and happiness on the contrary make him in a tense state just feel "happy to the extreme" running in excitement an "ambitious ecstasy" realization just a moment’s passion the rest is thinking about then should make a plan. These so-called happiness is only in summons even to sacrifice the representation essence. When he thought Mrs. Leonard lauder’s letter ruined his happiness he thought of revenge was eventually put into prison. Instead mak e him in prison released from social bondage freedom. He unloaded all camouflage and masks a bygone find the true self also found the essence of happiness. He gave up the escape and appeal can sincerely treat every friend frankly in death.
For in the love we also even with strong interest. Because in the successful happiness then destruction even with his love of close contact. His two lovers - Mrs. Leonard lauder’s and mathilda with short and struggle of life so might as well to see even respectively with the two lovers in the romance. Julien jeanvier and Mrs. Leonard lauder’s love for her even began to temptation. At first he just in the performance of the so-called "responsibility" this is a kind of noble Lord retaliation a vanity of satisfy. But Mrs. Leonard lauder’s the kind honest gentle deeply moved to even. A period of time he fell madly in love with Mrs. Leonard lauder’s. Unfortunately this loving and soon occupied by various ambition until finally and grubby outbreaks.
紅與黑讀後感英文（三）
The writer writing unfolds, first is entire French society's one typical window——small city Varriale's political pattern. The aristocrat is born German Switzerland that mayor is restores the dynasty in here highest representative, the maintenance restoration political power, prevents the bourgeoisie free party member is in power in politics regards as the inherent responsibilities. Poor collection post manager Valno the promise originally is the petty bourgeois, as a result of hires oneself the church secret organization saint can obtain the now the fat difference, thus oneself with restoration political power hitch in same place. Transcription hall Father Maslon is the spy which the church sends, all people's words and deeds all under his surveillance, the time which mutually supports in this king place and the sacrificial altar, is person which wields great power with great arrogance. These three people constitute " Three heads Politic ", reflected the restoration influence the aspect which you the city arrogated all powers to oneself in Varriale.But their opposite, is a large number, has the huge economic potentiality aggressive bourgeoisie free party member. Stendhal describes to the people guarantees king party member's be domineering and tyrannical, on the one hand again let the people draw such conclusion: Grasps has the economic potentiality the bourgeoisie, also will decide in politics is the final victor. 《 The Red and the Black 》 the book in circulation revolutionized in July, 1830 before, takes charge of soup reaches unexpectedly picture is understands clearly historical movement this one inevitably tends to.()
EnglishHouse
It is the same as read other novels of Dickens' too to read" David Copperfield", People feel every personage --From protagonist to warder not speaking --It is ready to appear , lifelike. This because Dickens very much can play up angry to a great extent Atmosphere, the method is that the detail is delineated. At the time of writing to Mr.Murdstone teach David such as him, have published a question in this way: "If I go to the cheese shop to buy 4,000 pieces of extra quality cheese in Gloucester ……" he will it shows to be" extra quality cheese of Gloucester" in detail only, but this set off appear personality of Mr.Murdstone vividly even more just --Mechanical, intend to embarrass David. He describes David's banquet, each kind of vegetables is not described well at all in it, Whether and this it make people unable to feel even more vivid too,like in among. Can enter silk enter and deduct detail of describing, it is obvious Dickens one outsight and realize strength better people more like this. He draws support from his pen Tell reader abundant impression of him whether make readers rise and fall of the happiness, anger, grief and joy with him.
哈姆雷特英語讀後感（一）
"Hamlet" about to complete in 1601. It is above all a plot of revenge tragedy of ups and downs, the most fascinating is that Hamlet's "hesitation": his revenge delay action until the last minute plot development. Dramatic beginning, there ghost of the kings of the things Claudius murdered Hamlet informed, ready to go on a revenge. However, Hamlet worried that this is "the devil" mischief, or the death of his father because of his depression caused by the sky, so the words do not believe in ghosts, but rather trying to view Claudius of a "play within the play" a reflection of themselves to determine whether he is the culprit. He could at confession by Claudius when he was killed, but out of religious considerations and do not want to start at this time, the other into heaven. Until he and Leietisi fencing, his mother mistakenly drank the original Claudius poisoned wine prepared for him to die, he was struggling to Pichu sword of vengeance, and he eventually fell in bloody revenge.
哈姆雷特英語讀後感（二）
“To be, or not to be, that is the question”。 But after answering this question, what comes next? To be in what kind of ways may bring you the value of life? And is the value precious enough for you to continue living? These are questions that can never be solved. Hamlet chose to live, in order to revenge the tragic death of his honest father, the Danish king. On account of Hamlet was so kind, he missed the best chance of killing his uncle, the murderer of his father. The uncle, who was the new king, devised several plans to kill Hamlet, indirectly killed Hamlet’s beloved Ophelia、Ophelia’s brother and father, and Hamlet’s mother, the new queen who was married to his uncle. These tragedies finally forced Hamlet to make his decision, and stabbed the sword of revenge to his uncle. Unfortunately, Hamlet was already hurt by a sword with poison on it and would be dead quickly at the moment. It was the kindness and hesitation made him fail. For his father, died while having a grasping dream and went to hell for that. Hamlet didn’t kill his uncle while he was praying because if he killed him at that time, he would have gone to heaven. Hamlet didn’t want to return good for evil, this irresolute nature caused the failure of his revenge. But why would god send a person to heaven or hell only considering what he’s thinking about at the last moment of life? Is that really fair? There is no doubt that Hamlet lived in a period of time that everybody was “crazy” and everybody except Hamlet was unaware of the truth. Hamlet even had to fake madness to prevent others from having suspicion. So why being sober when everybody else is drunk? Why being normal when everybody else is mad? It’s to keep your soul clear from being stained, it’s to stop cheating yourself when the truth is already out. It’s worthwhile to die for bringing out the truth, cause living with the concealed truth is worse than dying, especially when the truth that everyone should see is buried with your own hands. “To die - to sleep! But in that sleep of death what dreams may come”， who knows? The heaven loss of life in the play brought us shock, and in a short while, kept us from making the same mistake. But even this does not last too long. Time flies, but even flying time can not stop us from making the tragedy happens again and again. Instead, time took the sadness and regret away, weakened the memory. No more left but the sad touching story and the melody from fair Ophelia when she drowned in running stream. It’s not just a play, it’s something that is happening on the earth every moment. People never learn, soon the laughter and cheers may replace the lamentation, like the newborn roses covered the dead branches in spring. It’s the law of nature, living people continue living, death brings several days of weeping, but what remains? Nothing but dust and soil. This happened before, it’s happening now, but in the future （we hope） this shall never happen again.
哈姆雷特英語讀後感（三）
Were one to have the profound hatred, were one to avenge and harm his family who seems too far to harm, he would be either a hero or a monster. Should he fight the unbeatable foe and right the wrong, should he bear with unbearable sorrow, should he ruin himself in twisted enthusiasm, he would be Hamlet.
Among all the masterpieces of William Shakespeare, “Hamlet”， undoubtedly is worshipped and as one of the most successful and admired tragedies, while the character Hamlet remains one of the most loved dramatis personas in all-time history of literature.
To have read Shakespeare's “Romeo and Juliet” by the age of 16, I was moved to tears, while having no empathy with his another great one “Tempest”。 Presumably when I get 60 or older, I could be wise enough to understand the latter, but find it nothing worthwhile to go over the former one, where lays a romantic story that the only youngsters are addicted to. But it's a fact that whenever in our lifetime after gaining such experiences as getting through hard times, or, finding a real self, from “Hamlet”， we always find something that we consider as perpetuation, which is worth deep thoughts. This is because it highlights Hamlet's choices of life, choices made under certain circumstances of history and society, requested by the fate extraordinary to Hamlet himself, but ordinary to mankind. That is, to some extent, his experiences make a similar one to ours and, his destiny is something we're facing sometime in our own lives.
We're possibly the same. We explore the truth in the dark. We discover facts from the mist. We lose ourselves in determinations. We trespass on which we're forbid to be, hesitates at love and hatred, and struggle to rebuild system of values and spiritual prop in a world without standards and scales of standards.liuxue86.com
Hamlet couldn't have been perfect. He is very much a person motivated by irrational enthusiasm, impetuous enough to kill Polonius only to find it's a mistake as the victim is not the king. But somehow it is for his poor enthusiasm, his w eakness of humanity, that Hamlet touches countless readers, as everyone makes out himself from the ill-fated prince.
Hamlet's “revenge” isn't so much simply the killing of Claudius, as it is the purging of all the rottenness in the Danish court. And although it costs him his life, he succeeds.
At some time, we all consider how much wrong there is in the world. “Hamlet” gives us a chance to watch an ordinary person consciously choose to say “No!” to the world's wrongness and falsities, and to strike back with power. William Shakespeare held up the mirror to something in us that is precious.
I hear Hamlet thinking, “Too many people waste too much effort doing things that are not worthwhile. It's a bad world, and I am far from a perfect human being. We all end up dead in the end. So I am going to do something worthwhile, and do it right.”()
I hear him wondering, “What is a man, If his chief good and market of his time. Is but to sleep and feed? A beast, no more.”
I hear him whispering “To be, or not to be, aye, there's the point. To die, to sleep, is that all? Aye, all.”
That makes a hero to me, regardless of his blindness and madness which haunt everyone for a while in his time. Thousands of readers may have thousands of their own Hamlet, but there's something that stays the same, that Hamlet dares to run, where the brave dare not go. That's his quest.
Thinks about it.
把奸王“借刀殺人”的陰謀擊得粉碎；最後“以其人之道還治其人之身”，把雙重陷阱——毒劍和毒酒還給了奸王。在每一回合的鬥爭中，哈姆雷特都顯得形象高大。所以有評論說，《哈姆雷特》是一出“巨人型”的悲劇，此話不無道理。但哈姆雷特決非“完人”。他雖然善於思索，卻優柔寡斷；他雖然受到人民的愛戴，卻並不相信人民。他說：“時代變得越發不像樣子，—個農民的腳趾竟然這麼靠近一個朝臣的腳後跟，擦傷了後者的凍瘡。”可見哈姆雷特的社會改革與農民所要求的變革相距甚遠。儘管哈姆雷特有令人欽佩的才能，竭力想除舊佈新，但他總是鬱鬱不樂，遲疑不決，他始終是孤立的。這就註定了他與醜惡同歸於盡的悲慘命運。
《哈姆雷特》描寫人物心理的語言十分豐富，這在莎士比亞所有悲劇中也是十分突出的。如哈姆雷特的性格大部分是以“瘋話”表達出來的，他的“滿口荒唐言”就像迸發出來的火花。克勞迪斯陰陽怪氣的語言則照映出了他口蜜腹劍的醜態。波洛涅斯愛用詩體語言，給人以滑稽可笑的印象。
因為它談到了人生的抉擇，談到了一個生活在特定的歷史與生活環境下的人在對他個人來言是獨特的，而對於全人類來說又是普遍的的命運面前，在只有從過去所積累的有限的經驗可以憑藉與依託的情況下，所選擇的人生之路。從某種意義上說，他的經驗也代表了我們自己的經驗，他所面對的命運在我們人生的某個階段裡也是我們所要面對的。我們面對絕望的存在，在矛盾中摸索真理，在迷霧中找尋真相，在兩難問題裡作出行動，在一個失去標準與可以衡量標準的尺度的世界裡重建價值的體系與精神大廈……
哈姆雷特是不完美的，有時他的抉擇是非理性的，相當衝動的，比如當他在激怒之下一劍刺死他誤以為是國王的波洛涅斯時，然而或許正是他這種不理智的抉擇，這種人性的弱點的表現，讓我們打心底裡接受和認同他的藝術形象，因為我們常常可以在自己身上看見他的影子……
總之，《哈姆雷特》是一出人文主義思想家的悲劇，是歐洲文藝復興土壤裡長出來的一朵長開不敗的藝術之花，直至今天，還在散發出它所特有的馨香。
哈姆雷特的讀後感（三）
魯迅先生說：“悲劇是將人生有價值的東西毀滅給人看。”《哈姆雷特》就是一幕極具震撼力的悲劇。哈姆雷特是勇敢的，也是不怕死的；但是，他由於敏感而猶豫不定，由於思索而拖延，精力全花費在做決定上，反而失卻了行動的力量。哈姆雷特理想崇高、思想深刻，他立志重整乾坤，但他又耽於沉思、自責、自我懷疑上，加之憂鬱與孤獨，他迷惘、矛盾又痛苦。於是一再拖延復仇計畫，導致了最後的結局。文中最令人同情的就是悲慘的配角奧菲利婭，她柔弱、沉靜、靦腆又天真無邪。可她那脆弱的身心被愛和恨一起擠壓著、煎熬著。她不幸、痛苦、無助，卻都逆來順受地忍受了它，最終還是迷失了自己，離開了自己。“生存還是毀滅？是默默忍受命運的暴虐，或是挺身反抗人世無涯的苦難，通過鬥爭把它們掃清，這兩種行為，哪一種更高貴？”這峨我不知道，似乎也不是那麼容易分得清的事情，只是哈姆雷特選擇了後者，承擔起了那項他承擔不起，幾乎連渺茫的希望都沒有、但又決不可推卸的復仇重任。如今的現實中，倘若我們遇到了困難，我們是去面對它，還是選擇逃避？我想應該是面對。無論是什麼困難，沒有人解決不了的，除了死亡。可是就算在死亡面前，如果能勇敢的接受，那麼也算的上高貴了。總而言之，不論在什麼艱難險阻面前，我們都應該勇敢面對，接受挑戰。
《哈姆雷特》是一出人文主義思想家的悲劇。在《哈姆雷特》中，莎士比亞曾借人物之口表達自己的戲劇主張："自有戲劇以來，它的目的始終是反映自然，顯示善惡的本來面目，給它的時代看一看演變發展的模型。"悲劇《哈姆雷特》正是劇作家這種現實主義戲劇觀的生動體現。
哈姆雷特是悲劇的中心人物。他是一個典型的人文主義者。人文主義思想是文藝復興時期文學的核心，它體現了新興資產階級的世界觀，是資產階級與封建貴族、教會進行鬥爭的武器。人文主義著反對以神為中心的封建神學，宣傳人是宇宙的主宰，是萬物之本。哈姆雷特對世界和人類抱有巨大的熱情和美好的希望。他說："人是多麼了不起的一件物品！理性是多麼高貴！力量是多麼無窮！行動多麼像天使！瞭解多麼像天神！宇宙的精華！萬物的靈長！"他肯定人的現實生活，渴望純潔的友情和真摯的愛情。他聰明熱情、敏感善思、能文能武。他的戀人峨菲利亞說："啊，一顆多麼高貴的心就是這樣隕落了！"這樣的王子自然得到民眾的擁護，連他的敵人克勞迪斯也承認："他是為糊塗的群眾所喜愛的"。可是他一接觸社會的現實，他所崇拜的父王突然死去，而自己所愛的母親連為丈夫送葬的鞋子都沒有穿舊，就匆忙嫁給了從前受人恥笑的克勞迪斯。他感到憂鬱："人世間的一切在我看來是多麼可厭、陳腐、乏味而無聊！"經過一番深沉的思考，把個人問題與整個社會聯繫起來，發現"時代一切都脫節了"，"丹麥是一座監獄"，"我決心擔負起重整乾坤的責任"。這樣為父報仇實際上成了改造社會的一個具體行動。他有意安排了"戲中戲"以便進一步證實奸王的罪行。當罪行的真-相確證以後，便立即行動。但為了尋找正義的手段，他放棄了在奸王祈禱把他殺死的機會，接著又誤殺了波洛涅斯，這樣就招來被放逐的命令。最後，他雖然逃了回來，在決鬥中殺死了奸王，自己也因中了毒劍而犧牲，"重整乾坤"的責任也落空了。()
《哈姆雷特》在藝術上也能集中體現作者的創作特色。劇作的生活畫面廣闊，情節的展開生動、豐富。劇作所反映的生活畫面，從皇宮到家庭，從深閨到墓地，從軍士守衛到民眾造反，從劇場到比劍場，構成了劇中人物活動的廣闊的背景。莎士比亞非常注重情節的安排，一波未平，一波又起。除復仇的情節之外，還配合諸如愛情、友情、親子關係等，對情節的發展起了推動的作用。與情節的生動性和豐富性相聯繫，作者還組織了豐富多彩的戲劇場面。如"戲中戲"演出的那一場，是一場重點戲，又是過渡戲，是哈姆雷特的思想和行動的轉捩點。
莎士比亞是語言大師。他的戲劇語言豐富多彩，富有詩意。他的劇作主要是用自由的無韻詩體寫成，還有民間歌謠，其人物的語言也變化多端。
刻畫哈姆雷特時，多次運用獨白，詩體與散文交相使用，哲理與抒情相結合，具有強烈的藝術感染力。
《哈姆雷特》是一部巨作，它給我很多很多，值得一看！
紅與黑讀後感英文（一）
Review of The Red And The Black
During extracurricular time, I finished reading The Red And The Black. It was a typical and fundamental European work of criticism and realism which was released in the 19th century. Throughout the whole book, it is fulfilled with the hero Julien’s experiences and final failure during his struggling life. Especially his two love stories, which incisively and vividly revealed the hideous social ethos at the beginning of 19th century. Besides, the book strongly deprecates the impuissance of monarch, noble and the contemptibility of church and bourgeois. Its way of statement is really worth appreciating too.
The author is really good at revealing the serious social problem from love. Julien’s two love experiences were tightly related to the social wind and cloud that time and it was one aspect of class struggle. Julien indeed fell in love with Mrs. de Renal later, but he was only out of a kind of revengeful thought against dignitary at the very beginning. Thereby, when first seizing on Mrs. de Renal’s hand, he felt that it was not the happiness out of love, but Napoleon’s victory of ambition and spree. It is more like the satisfaction of retaliation.
If there was much of love between Julien and Mrs. de Renal in pursuit of her, there must have been no love between Julien and Mathilde but a political game. Mathilde was a haughty and willful noble young girl. She was profoundly influenced by French revolution. She puerilely thought that if there would have been a new revolution, the dominator of this society must be the energetic young people like Julien and marrying him was not only romantic but also dependable. By contrast, Julien believed that if he would have married Mathilde, he could promote his position and rapid advancement in his career and managed to cheat her love.
To Julien, his two loves were failed without any surprise. Julien never could enter the gerentocratic, his love will never be allowed by superior.
The Red And The Black successfully set up a typical role in its special environment. Its shapely art structure and the using of line drawing are really outstanding. Its excellent mind description is very admirable. Realism writers all pay much attention to the truth of detail, but the author of this book not liked to depict the object environment, instead of the roles’ inside ideas. He just used several sentences to introduce the environment and the movement of roles, but use large paragraph to detail the role’s interior mental movement. Julien’s happiness, distress and confess and his complicated mental movement were incisively and vividly described. Besides, the scenery was also a great part of this book. Absolute clear is the beauty of the style. Brief, simplicity and clarity were the most apparent specialty. Different sceneries switching and developing system are much like a film script. It is the typical literary novel.
紅與黑讀後感英文（二）
In even the fate of bellaire. Cable gladne affects me. Throughout his extremely short but is full of twists of young life flowing turmoil with too many contradictions and complex. To this people can make a lot of judgment -- a small SiYouZhe blind pursue personal interests tragedy. An ambitious destruction; A feudal fighter sacrifice etc. All have views but are sensible. I think said even a individualism in would be nice but ambitious than a the pursuit of happiness and unfortunate went wrong people more precisely. Natural this wrong not simply take a memorized the means of social morality but from his mind deeper contradictions essence.
Even in all his life in the pursuit of happiness. Though he but humble origins to education and by good with outstanding wisdom so his future in the so-called these parisians of society. What is happiness and how to achieve happiness is puzzling humanity for thousands of years also puzzling our in even. In their mind happiness and no exact standard just in his deceit in his vigilance his another "battle plan" in its implementation. He is the first out of the abuse and happiness custom for Mrs. Leonard lauder’s front perform "some responsibility" and happiness as proud mathilde in front of your happiness for yield fictions and happy again the hell. He desire happiness eager to rocketing he vowed that he would rather die a thousand times will make a meteoric rise. Therefore he made a and a "war plan" use all sorts of false means he superman wisdom play incisively and vividly. But after all he is a good young plant so in often of happiness he will ask yourself deeply remorse. Therefore his plan always loopholes always questionable.
It is found that even in this kind of happiness in the standard in society and others standard for the standard the pursuit of others and the society admits. In essence he didn’t get much joy and happiness on the contrary make him in a tense state just feel "happy to the extreme" running in excitement an "ambitious ecstasy" realization just a moment’s passion the rest is thinking about then should make a plan. These so-called happiness is only in summons even to sacrifice the representation essence. When he thought Mrs. Leonard lauder’s letter ruined his happiness he thought of revenge was eventually put into prison. Instead mak e him in prison released from social bondage freedom. He unloaded all camouflage and masks a bygone find the true self also found the essence of happiness. He gave up the escape and appeal can sincerely treat every friend frankly in death.
For in the love we also even with strong interest. Because in the successful happiness then destruction even with his love of close contact. His two lovers - Mrs. Leonard lauder’s and mathilda with short and struggle of life so might as well to see even respectively with the two lovers in the romance. Julien jeanvier and Mrs. Leonard lauder’s love for her even began to temptation. At first he just in the performance of the so-called "responsibility" this is a kind of noble Lord retaliation a vanity of satisfy. But Mrs. Leonard lauder’s the kind honest gentle deeply moved to even. A period of time he fell madly in love with Mrs. Leonard lauder’s. Unfortunately this loving and soon occupied by various ambition until finally and grubby outbreaks.
紅與黑讀後感英文（三）
The writer writing unfolds, first is entire French society's one typical window——small city Varriale's political pattern. The aristocrat is born German Switzerland that mayor is restores the dynasty in here highest representative, the maintenance restoration political power, prevents the bourgeoisie free party member is in power in politics regards as the inherent responsibilities. Poor collection post manager Valno the promise originally is the petty bourgeois, as a result of hires oneself the church secret organization saint can obtain the now the fat difference, thus oneself with restoration political power hitch in same place. Transcription hall Father Maslon is the spy which the church sends, all people's words and deeds all under his surveillance, the time which mutually supports in this king place and the sacrificial altar, is person which wields great power with great arrogance. These three people constitute " Three heads Politic ", reflected the restoration influence the aspect which you the city arrogated all powers to oneself in Varriale.But their opposite, is a large number, has the huge economic potentiality aggressive bourgeoisie free party member. Stendhal describes to the people guarantees king party member's be domineering and tyrannical, on the one hand again let the people draw such conclusion: Grasps has the economic potentiality the bourgeoisie, also will decide in politics is the final victor. 《 The Red and the Black 》 the book in circulation revolutionized in July, 1830 before, takes charge of soup reaches unexpectedly picture is understands clearly historical movement this one inevitably tends to.()
EnglishHouse
It is the same as read other novels of Dickens' too to read" David Copperfield", People feel every personage --From protagonist to warder not speaking --It is ready to appear , lifelike. This because Dickens very much can play up angry to a great extent Atmosphere, the method is that the detail is delineated. At the time of writing to Mr.Murdstone teach David such as him, have published a question in this way: "If I go to the cheese shop to buy 4,000 pieces of extra quality cheese in Gloucester ……" he will it shows to be" extra quality cheese of Gloucester" in detail only, but this set off appear personality of Mr.Murdstone vividly even more just --Mechanical, intend to embarrass David. He describes David's banquet, each kind of vegetables is not described well at all in it, Whether and this it make people unable to feel even more vivid too,like in among. Can enter silk enter and deduct detail of describing, it is obvious Dickens one outsight and realize strength better people more like this. He draws support from his pen Tell reader abundant impression of him whether make readers rise and fall of the happiness, anger, grief and joy with him.
哈姆雷特英語讀後感（一）
"Hamlet" about to complete in 1601. It is above all a plot of revenge tragedy of ups and downs, the most fascinating is that Hamlet's "hesitation": his revenge delay action until the last minute plot development. Dramatic beginning, there ghost of the kings of the things Claudius murdered Hamlet informed, ready to go on a revenge. However, Hamlet worried that this is "the devil" mischief, or the death of his father because of his depression caused by the sky, so the words do not believe in ghosts, but rather trying to view Claudius of a "play within the play" a reflection of themselves to determine whether he is the culprit. He could at confession by Claudius when he was killed, but out of religious considerations and do not want to start at this time, the other into heaven. Until he and Leietisi fencing, his mother mistakenly drank the original Claudius poisoned wine prepared for him to die, he was struggling to Pichu sword of vengeance, and he eventually fell in bloody revenge.
哈姆雷特英語讀後感（二）
“To be, or not to be, that is the question”。 But after answering this question, what comes next? To be in what kind of ways may bring you the value of life? And is the value precious enough for you to continue living? These are questions that can never be solved. Hamlet chose to live, in order to revenge the tragic death of his honest father, the Danish king. On account of Hamlet was so kind, he missed the best chance of killing his uncle, the murderer of his father. The uncle, who was the new king, devised several plans to kill Hamlet, indirectly killed Hamlet’s beloved Ophelia、Ophelia’s brother and father, and Hamlet’s mother, the new queen who was married to his uncle. These tragedies finally forced Hamlet to make his decision, and stabbed the sword of revenge to his uncle. Unfortunately, Hamlet was already hurt by a sword with poison on it and would be dead quickly at the moment. It was the kindness and hesitation made him fail. For his father, died while having a grasping dream and went to hell for that. Hamlet didn’t kill his uncle while he was praying because if he killed him at that time, he would have gone to heaven. Hamlet didn’t want to return good for evil, this irresolute nature caused the failure of his revenge. But why would god send a person to heaven or hell only considering what he’s thinking about at the last moment of life? Is that really fair? There is no doubt that Hamlet lived in a period of time that everybody was “crazy” and everybody except Hamlet was unaware of the truth. Hamlet even had to fake madness to prevent others from having suspicion. So why being sober when everybody else is drunk? Why being normal when everybody else is mad? It’s to keep your soul clear from being stained, it’s to stop cheating yourself when the truth is already out. It’s worthwhile to die for bringing out the truth, cause living with the concealed truth is worse than dying, especially when the truth that everyone should see is buried with your own hands. “To die - to sleep! But in that sleep of death what dreams may come”， who knows? The heaven loss of life in the play brought us shock, and in a short while, kept us from making the same mistake. But even this does not last too long. Time flies, but even flying time can not stop us from making the tragedy happens again and again. Instead, time took the sadness and regret away, weakened the memory. No more left but the sad touching story and the melody from fair Ophelia when she drowned in running stream. It’s not just a play, it’s something that is happening on the earth every moment. People never learn, soon the laughter and cheers may replace the lamentation, like the newborn roses covered the dead branches in spring. It’s the law of nature, living people continue living, death brings several days of weeping, but what remains? Nothing but dust and soil. This happened before, it’s happening now, but in the future （we hope） this shall never happen again.
哈姆雷特英語讀後感（三）
Were one to have the profound hatred, were one to avenge and harm his family who seems too far to harm, he would be either a hero or a monster. Should he fight the unbeatable foe and right the wrong, should he bear with unbearable sorrow, should he ruin himself in twisted enthusiasm, he would be Hamlet.
Among all the masterpieces of William Shakespeare, “Hamlet”， undoubtedly is worshipped and as one of the most successful and admired tragedies, while the character Hamlet remains one of the most loved dramatis personas in all-time history of literature.
To have read Shakespeare's “Romeo and Juliet” by the age of 16, I was moved to tears, while having no empathy with his another great one “Tempest”。 Presumably when I get 60 or older, I could be wise enough to understand the latter, but find it nothing worthwhile to go over the former one, where lays a romantic story that the only youngsters are addicted to. But it's a fact that whenever in our lifetime after gaining such experiences as getting through hard times, or, finding a real self, from “Hamlet”， we always find something that we consider as perpetuation, which is worth deep thoughts. This is because it highlights Hamlet's choices of life, choices made under certain circumstances of history and society, requested by the fate extraordinary to Hamlet himself, but ordinary to mankind. That is, to some extent, his experiences make a similar one to ours and, his destiny is something we're facing sometime in our own lives.
We're possibly the same. We explore the truth in the dark. We discover facts from the mist. We lose ourselves in determinations. We trespass on which we're forbid to be, hesitates at love and hatred, and struggle to rebuild system of values and spiritual prop in a world without standards and scales of standards.liuxue86.com
Hamlet couldn't have been perfect. He is very much a person motivated by irrational enthusiasm, impetuous enough to kill Polonius only to find it's a mistake as the victim is not the king. But somehow it is for his poor enthusiasm, his w eakness of humanity, that Hamlet touches countless readers, as everyone makes out himself from the ill-fated prince.
Hamlet's “revenge” isn't so much simply the killing of Claudius, as it is the purging of all the rottenness in the Danish court. And although it costs him his life, he succeeds.
At some time, we all consider how much wrong there is in the world. “Hamlet” gives us a chance to watch an ordinary person consciously choose to say “No!” to the world's wrongness and falsities, and to strike back with power. William Shakespeare held up the mirror to something in us that is precious.
I hear Hamlet thinking, “Too many people waste too much effort doing things that are not worthwhile. It's a bad world, and I am far from a perfect human being. We all end up dead in the end. So I am going to do something worthwhile, and do it right.”()
I hear him wondering, “What is a man, If his chief good and market of his time. Is but to sleep and feed? A beast, no more.”
I hear him whispering “To be, or not to be, aye, there's the point. To die, to sleep, is that all? Aye, all.”
That makes a hero to me, regardless of his blindness and madness which haunt everyone for a while in his time. Thousands of readers may have thousands of their own Hamlet, but there's something that stays the same, that Hamlet dares to run, where the brave dare not go. That's his quest.
Thinks about it.
